No. The official route remains subject to the applicable classification, vetting, admissibility and visa-availability requirements.
Keep payment and eligibility separate
Describe the actual applicant and current official terms. Financial capacity does not establish that every individual condition has been satisfied or that a favourable decision is guaranteed.
The described route uses EB-1 or EB-2, but the gift is not legally irrelevant to that determination: the governing executive order directs the agencies to treat it as evidence of the specified EB-1 or EB-2 eligibility basis. The published framework describes a corporate-sponsored route alongside the individual one, with a principal gift of US$2 million per corporate-sponsored employee rather than US$1 million for an individual. Permanent residence is then described as granted through an existing employment-based category as determined by the authorities and subject to visa availability. The official instructions and the applicant's own identity, history, and source-of-payment records settle the question; a third-party summary does not. The processing fee starts the official process and, after successful vetting, the qualifying gift is treated as evidence for specified EB-1 or EB-2 grounds. Do not assume the framework grants citizenship or bypasses background review simply because the proposed financial commitment is available.