TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
For the next job. The bold idea. The life you can already picture.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Hypothetical example: a Headingley applicant receives an offer on a group’s letterhead, a payroll form naming a subsidiary and a customer agreement signed by another entity. A business purchase may similarly use a franchise brand that differs from the company being acquired. Identify the actual parties before assuming a shared name establishes the immigration relationship.
TN, L-1A, L-1B, E-2, EB-5 and Gold Card use different facts. TN concerns temporary listed professional work for eligible citizens. L concerns qualifying organizations, foreign employment and the U.S. role. E-2 examines treaty nationality, committed investment and enterprise direction. EB-5 concerns qualifying immigrant capital and jobs. Gold Card uses official gift-based terms with individual immigration requirements. A familiar brand is not proof of all these relationships.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
Letterhead and payroll names may need an explanation.

Create an entity key showing each legal name, its role and the document that identifies it. Keep the employer, customer, owner, borrower, investor and sponsor separate where they are different parties. Explain the links with genuine records rather than replacing every name with the parent brand. The review should follow who actually employs, controls, pays or receives the funds.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
Record legal names from the offer, corporate records and financial agreements without simplifying them into one brand.
Identify who employs, directs, owns, finances or receives the applicant’s work or money.
Use genuine ownership, control and contract evidence to explain relationships rather than assume them.
Assess the relevant route using the actual parties before relying on a work or financial commitment.
An initial consultation can begin with a small set of inconsistent documents. Identify which fact is unclear and who can confirm the legal relationship. Do not assume the most prominent company name is the employer or that one company’s evidence establishes another’s obligations. Clarifying the parties can change the questions that need assessment.
Find your pathwayPrepare the Headingley request around the actual applicant and agreements, with an entity key attached. Confirm the scope and handling of business records. Corporate identity, operational responsibility and immigration eligibility are connected but distinct; a polished group presentation does not itself establish the proposed route.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
No. Identify the actual entities and use ownership or control evidence relevant to the proposed route.
No. Preserve accurate legal names and explain the relationships. A simplified brand label should not replace the actual parties.
Not automatically. Trace ownership of the funds, lawful transactions and the actual commitment rather than treating all group money as interchangeable.
Bring the current records and identify the discrepancy. The actual employer and work arrangement should be clarified before the proposal is relied upon.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.