TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
For the next job. The bold idea. The life you can already picture.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Hypothetical example: a Ritchot applicant receives one proposed budget containing compensation, relocation expenses, business funding and professional charges. Another applicant receives a purchase invoice combining equipment, fees and financed amounts. Break the figures into their actual purposes before assuming the total establishes an immigration requirement.
TN, L-1A, L-1B, E-2, EB-5 and Gold Card ask different questions. Professional and company-transfer routes depend on actual work and qualifying evidence. E-2 assesses an investor and enterprise, including qualifying committed capital. EB-5 has its own immigrant capital and job conditions. Gold Card uses official government gift terms. A large combined payment does not make these frameworks interchangeable.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
Compensation does not identify the listed profession or credential.

Create a payment schedule showing payer, recipient, purpose, source, timing and any return or security terms. Preserve the underlying records instead of assigning every amount to the most helpful category. A payroll commitment, operating reserve and personal investment each establish different facts, and a fee is not automatically qualifying capital.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
List the individual compensation, operating, investment and administrative components.
Record who pays whom, why, and whether the money is available, committed or only projected.
Use genuine agreements, source records and security details to explain each relevant amount.
Assess what the payment establishes before relying on a combined budget or a proposed transfer date.
A consultation can begin with the current budget and questions about its components. Identify estimates as estimates, and explain missing bank or contract records. Review the actual proposal before treating a headline amount as proof of eligibility or as a complete forecast of the household’s obligations.
Find your pathwayFrame the Ritchot request around the amounts and decisions requiring assessment. Keep private financial records relevant to the inquiry and confirm the review scope. The objective is to connect payments with their real purpose and the applicable immigration condition, while recognizing that commercial affordability and immigration eligibility are different questions.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
Not by itself. Identify what each amount represents and assess the actual route’s requirements.
Yes, if clearly labelled and supported where possible. Do not present a projected receipt or cost as a completed transaction.
No. Review actual payment purposes and the applicable investment rules rather than adding every cost to qualifying capital.
No. Review the actual classification and permission; a payment alone does not establish authority to begin the activity.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.