Skip to content
RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF RITCHOT · DECISION WORKSHEET

Ritchot guide: distinguish employer resources from the applicant’s investment

USAvisa field guide · 2 minute readReviewed 7 September 2026

Read the general pathway comparison overview

THE SHORT ANSWER

Money available to a company can matter to a transfer proposal without automatically being the applicant’s E-2 capital. Identify ownership, source and commitment before treating business resources as interchangeable evidence.

01

Describe whose money supports which arrangement

Hypothetical example: an employee could transfer to a related U.S. operation or acquire a separate business using personal financing. For L-1, assess qualifying organizations, required foreign employment and managerial, executive or specialized-knowledge work. The company’s budget does not create missing qualifying history.

02

Assess the actual investor transaction

E-2 requires treaty nationality, generally at least 50% enterprise ownership by nationals of the relevant treaty country, substantial lawful capital committed at risk and a real nonmarginal enterprise the investor will develop and direct. Identify how the applicant obtained and committed the funds; a corporate bank balance is not automatically the individual’s qualifying investment.

03

Compare the evidence the funding cannot replace

A transfer budget does not establish actual managerial duties or specialized knowledge. An acquisition total does not settle control, loan security or nonmarginality. Review the real work, business and family plans together without assuming either financial arrangement authorizes immediate U.S. activity.

A CONVERSATION IS A GOOD PLACE TO START.

WHAT’S YOUR
NEXT CHAPTER?

Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.

Book a free consultation Or call +1 431 444 9501