No. Assess the actual new work, supervision and permission.
Review the current placement
The offsite conditions concern real control and purpose. An earlier contract or decision should not be treated as automatic authorization for a different assignment.
Review whether the proposed duties still rely on the knowledge described in the filing, especially if the revised process is materially different. Identify which facts now need fresh review and whether an amended filing or new petition is needed before the employee begins the changed assignment. Describe both accurately and obtain review of material assignment changes before relying on the original filing account. A delivery deadline does not establish authority to begin a materially different assignment while the immigration questions remain unresolved. An internal extension of the assignment or a continued salary does not itself establish that immigration authorization covers the revised position. Ask what a further review would cost if the customer later changes the engagement materially, so the business can price that risk rather than absorb it unplanned. The company must decide whether a change is material enough to require review before the employee begins different work.