No. Ownership can help explain the corporate relationship, but the qualifying employment abroad, the entities' business activity, and the proposed managerial or executive role in the U.S. still each need to be established with their own evidence.
Treat ownership as one fact among several
Explain what the applicant will actually decide and direct after the transfer, and who will perform the routine operational work instead. Where several holding entities or co-owners are involved, have the control structure assessed from the governing documents rather than an organizational chart alone.
The employment year comes second, and must be continuous, full-time and inside the three years preceding the petition, evidenced by payroll rather than by a letter summarising a career. An entity that keeps an office, a bank account and a corporate registration but supplies nothing is not doing business in the sense the rule intends, and neither is one that exists only as an agent for the American side. The petition has to choose which of the two managerial theories it relies on, supervising other supervisory, professional or managerial employees or managing an essential function at a senior level, and then produce the evidence that theory needs.