No. Review this investment’s capital, jobs and individual eligibility.
Use prior experience as context
A previous commercial outcome does not prove the current project’s conditions or guarantee repayment. The actual proposal needs its own evidence.
Confirm which capital threshold actually applies to this project and why, and separately assess whether the investor's funding history and the project's job-creation plan are each adequately documented. EB-5 capital must remain genuinely at risk; a possible asset sale can be modelled, but an unconditional right to repayment or guaranteed return may conflict with that condition. The first review should identify the agreement clause that gives the investor management or policy rights, the source-and-path records for capital, and the job methodology that applies to that structure. Access to the reduced capital threshold depends on the specific project's qualifying circumstances, not on the investor's preference for a lower figure. If a return of capital occurred, ask whether its date and terms affect your petition; a commercial loss is a different event, and a later replacement does not automatically cure an immigration problem.